Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Miracast lets you share content without a Wi-Fi signal

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 20 September 2012 | 08.21

Wirelessly sharing content across multiple devices is nothing new, but streaming technology Miracast will let you share photos, videos, music and more across any certified device, regardless of manufacturer, without a Wi-Fi signal.

The Wi-Fi Alliance on Wednesday launched the Miracast certification program, so that Miracast-equipped devices that have been proven compatible with other devices in the program will be labeled as such. Miracast devices use built in Wi-Fi Direct, which means no wireless router is required.

IHS iSuppli analyst Brian O'Rourke said the certification program will let consumers know which gadgets are compatible with one another.

"All that's really been on the market to date has been technology with Intel's Wi-Di technology, mostly to connect things like notebook PCs to TVs," O'Rourke said. "The Miracast standard will be beyond Intel's Wi-Di, which is a proprietary technology. It creates a commonly understood and supported standard."

Similar certification programs for wireless devices exist, such as the Digital Living Network Association established by Sony in 2008. DLNA functions differently than Miracast in that compatible devices must first connect to a home Wi-Fi network. Apple's AirPlay functions similarly, allowing iDevices to stream to one another using a Wi-Fi signal.

Samsung Galaxy III

The first Miracast-certified products include the Samsung Galaxy S III and the LG Optimus G smartphones. According to the Wi-Fi Alliance, growth of Miracast-certified devices is expected to exceed 1 billion annual shipments within the next four years.

LG Optimus G

Chip-makers such as Broadcom have already signed on with Miracast.  According to O'Rourke, this will encourage OEMs to develop Miracast devices.

"They know from the chip level they'll be able to connect from device to device, and everything will be compatible," O'Rourke said.

The Wi-Fi Alliance selected six devices (including wireless cards and adapters) against which to test Miracast interoperability, so a Samsung smartphone can stream to an LG TV or vice versa. Samsung's Echo-P Series TV was also one of the first Miracast-certified products, though the model is not yet on the market.

Samsung is already using AllShare Cast, a streaming tech based on Miracast, in several of its devices, including the Galaxy S III and Galaxy Note II. The company in a statement said it plans to bring more Miracast-compatible devices to market.

Rumors flew prior to Apple's iPhone 5 launch that the company would introduce AirPlay Direct to allow iPhones, iPads, MacBooks and other devices to wirelessly stream without the presence of a Wi-Fi signal.  That rumor (along with several others) didn't come to fruition.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.techhive.com/article/2010110/miracast-lets-you-share-content-without-a-wi-fi-signal.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
08.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

A quick fix for problems with Windows Update

Quick housekeeping note: Hey, you've found the new Hassle-Free PC! Well done. Actually, what you've found is the new address for Hassle-Free PC, meaning it's time to update your bookmark. Here's the Web address for the blog, which I hope you'll continue to visit daily: http://www.pcworld.com/column/hassle-free-pc.

Now, then, on to business...

For the past couple weeks I've noticed that whenever I shut down my PC, Windows installs updates. Or at least appears to install them.

Typically this happens only once in a while, not every time. So I checked Windows Update to see which updates were in the queue. Then I shut down, rebooted, and checked it again: sure enough, those same two updates were still there -- they hadn't been installed at all. Or perhaps they had, but something inside Windows wasn't recognizing that fact.

Unfortunately, these kinds of problems aren't uncommon. And they aren't limited to Windows repeatedly offering the same update; I've also had letters from readers who get error messages after Windows tries to update itself.

This can be a tricky issue to solve, but here's a good place to start: Microsoft's Windows Update Fix-it. This automated tool will scan your Windows Update configuration and repair any problems it finds, resolve any incorrect data locations, and re-register required services.

All you do is click the Run Now button, then follow the onscreen prompts. (Depending on what browser you use and how it's configured, you may need to manually run the Fix-it after downloading it.)

With any luck, the tool will get Windows Update running properly again. If not, you can find a few additional troubleshooting options on Microsoft's knowledge-base page, "Windows Update or Microsoft Update repeatedly offers the same update."

Have you had problems getting Windows Update to work properly? If so, were you able to find a fix?

Contributing Editor Rick Broida writes about business and consumer technology. Ask for help with your PC hassles at hasslefree@pcworld.com, or try the treasure trove of helpful folks in the PC World Community Forums. Sign up to have the Hassle-Free PC newsletter e-mailed to you each week.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010087/a-quick-fix-for-problems-with-windows-update.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
08.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

Microsoft offers one-click workaround for IE vulnerability, permanent fix coming Friday

Ian Paul

Ian Paulian@ianpaul.net

Ian is an independent writer based in Tel Aviv, Israel. His current focus is on all things tech including mobile devices, desktop and laptop computers, software, social networks, Web apps, tech-related legislation and corporate tech news.
More by Ian Paul

Microsoft has issued a one-click security workaround for Internet Explorer as a stopgap measure until the company releases a full security update for its Web browser on Friday. The new "Fix it" solution helps protect users of Internet Explorer 6, 7, 8, and 9 from a recently disclosed memory corruption issue that several security experts have seen in active use. The vulnerabilities could allow a hacker to gain remote access to your system with the same user privileges as you including the ability to install or remove programs, modify files, and create new user accounts.

[RELATED: Web browser showdown: Which Windows app is really the best? ]

The one-click solution is available from this Microsoft support document under the heading "Fix it for me." Microsoft's Fix it tool does not require a reboot once enabled and the company says the automated workaround will not affect your ability to browse the Web.

Researchers at security firm AlienVault recently said a variant of the latest IE vulnerability was found in the wild and attempted to install a remote access Trojan (RAT) on a user's computer. A RAT would give hackers remote access to your computer and can be used for everything from wiping your hard drive to capturing every keystroke you enter. Security firm Sophos in a blog post  also said it had seen hackers using the IE vulnerability in the wild, but the company did not specify what hackers were trying to accomplish with the exploit.

The latest Internet Explorer vulnerability is considered a critical threat. The seriousness of the issue prompted the German government on Tuesday to urge users to give up using IE until Microsoft released a security patch for the vulnerability. Other security experts also advised giving up IE until there was a fix including the Metasploit Project and the security firm F-Secure. Prior to releasing its Fix it tool, Microsoft suggested a somewhat impractical multi-step manual workaround to help mitigate any potential attacks.

Microsoft says it hopes to release Friday's security update for IE as close as possible to 10 a.m. Pacific. You will be able to get the patch via Windows Update. If you have automatic updates enabled, you shouldn't have to take any action to get the security fix. Microsoft also said Friday's update will include more fixes in addition to the memory corruption issue.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010180/microsoft-offers-one-click-workaround-for-ie-vulnerability-permanent-fix-coming-friday.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
08.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

Safely send private information over the Internet

KenWid10 asked the Antivirus & Security Software forum how best to send encrypted information to someone over the Internet.

You should never, ever just email credit card numbers, passwords, or other private information. You don't know how many servers the message will pass through between your computer and the recipient's, or who has access to those servers. Email is only slightly more private than a billboard. (A slight exaggeration, but you get the point.)

A truly private message must be encrypted before it leaves your computer, and remain encrypted until the recipient receives it. To complicate things further, you can't assume that the recipient is any more tech savvy than that uncle who freaks out when you open a new tab on his browser.

Here are two ways to safely send private information over the Internet:

Email an encrypted .zip file

You can put the sensitive information into a file (of any format the recipient can handle), then compress the file into a password-protected, encrypted .zip archive file, and email that to the recipient. This works, with two caveats:

The .zip format's default encryption standard, ZipCrypto, could probably be hacked by a duck. And while most up-to-date zip programs support much stronger, 256-bit AES encryption, not everyone has one of these programs. Most users rely on Windows's native .zip support, which doesn't support AES.

Both you and your recipient will need a .zip program that supports AES. And no, you can't create an encrypted .exe file and mail that; many email programs won't allow you to send or receive .exe files.

Among the programs that support AES are the industry standard WinZip and the free 7-zip.

7-Zip encryptionBe sure to use AES encryption when mailing confidential information in a .zip file. Shown here in 7-Zip.

The other caveat: You and the recipient have to share a your password, and emailing the password isn't safe.

The best passwords for this situation include shared information. For instance, if you're sending tax forms to your accountant, you can use your social security number, which he or she already has.

Skip email altogether and use the cloud

Or you can try a solution that doesn't require special software or a shared password. To my mind, the best such solution is a cloud-based service called Sendinc.

To use this service, both you and the recipient must have Sendinc accounts. Joining is easy, and unless your messages are larger than 10MB each, or you're sending more than 20 of them a day, a free membership will do. If you send a message to someone who doesn't have a membership, they'll be invited to sign up.

Sendinc uploads and downloads encrypted information via SSL (the same technology used by banks and shopping sites). Your messages remain encrypted on the Sendinc server, with a unique password per message, until they are destroyed after seven days. During that time, they will only be decrypted for delivery (via SSL) to the recipient.

But whatever method you choose, remember that your security is only as good as your password. Come up with a strong one that no one is likely to guess.

Read the original forum discussion.

Contributing Editor Lincoln Spector writes about technology and cinema. Email your tech questions to him at answer@pcworld.com, or post them to a community of helpful folks on the PCW Answer Line forum. Follow Lincoln on Twitter, or subscribe to the Answer Line newsletter, e-mailed weekly.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/262326/safely_send_private_information_over_the_internet.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
08.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

HP honcho Bradley: Post-PC world claim "just wrong"

Hewlett-Packard's Todd Bradley might have missed his calling as a politician. Bradley, executive vice president of HP's printing and personal systems group, clearly lives and breathes his company's products, and it shows in his answers to my questions during a recent phone and email Q&A.

His answers often include highly detailed information--even down to the level of individual product skews--but he uses phrasing that sometimes sounds like scripted HP-speak. I asked Bradley questions about the upcoming HP Windows 8 computers, what printing will be like in the future, and what type of mobile gear we will see from HP in the months ahead, among other things.

PCW: What will Windows 8 mean to HP and its customers?

Bradley: Clearly the touch opportunity is significant. We pioneered the touch many years ago built on top of a Microsoft system. HP has a long tradition of innovating in touch interfaces, and it's great to have Microsoft agree and support us.  Whether it's a touch interface you use occasionally on a notebook or desktop, or something you use all the time with tablets, we think customers will really be excited.

PCW: Thoughts on Microsoft releasing its own Windows Surface tablet?

Bradley: We are confident with our competitive offerings. I'm not going to comment on anybody else's announcements. Microsoft remains a key partner, and the market for tablets is huge. And customers really win when there are lots of choices.

PCW: How do you react when people say we're in a post-PC era?

Bradley: Look, it's just wrong. Just think of the decision when your child is going off to college. What's a requirement? A PC. Or you run a business and need your employees to be productive. You need a PC. The size of the global PC business is huge, and I think some people are trying to be dramatic. That said, there is a growing role for tablets, and we will absolutely be a significant force in that space.

PCW: HP makes some of the most important hardware for consumers and business. Same goes for the services that you provide. But all the attention is on web services, tablets, and smartphones. Critics say HP has missed the boat on the mobile revolution. Is that fair?

HP's Envy x2 laptop. Image: HPHP's ENVY x2 laptop. Image: HP

Bradley: Our new hybrid notebook, the ENVY x2, that doubles as a tablet, is one of the first products we've announced that runs Windows 8, and we'll follow it with an enterprise-ready tablet later in the Windows 8 timeframe. This market is still young, and we will be a significant player.

PCW: When it comes to having an ARM tablet I've heard mixed reports on what HP is up to. Some headlines have reported that you had an ARM tablet in the works and then decided to kill the project. Can you tell me what's really going on and if you will be coming to market with an ARM-based tablet soon?

Bradley: I don't think those reports are entirely accurate. Our first Windows 8 tablets are going to be on the x86 platform. We are going with Intel and AMD architecture after getting a lot of input from our customers. Our focus is going into the enterprise and creating phenomenal products. That has an enormous amount to do with our decision.

We know and understand the robust and very established ecosystem that x86 applications provides. We see x86 chips delivering one of the best experiences in the short term and near future. We will continue to develop with our partners in the ARM ecosystem. We think that work is very important. But our first tablets will be based on the x86 architecture.

PCW: Can you describe how the consumer PC desktop and laptop market has changed just in the past five years and how hard it is to stay on top?

Bradley: Some great changes have emerged over recent years. Thin and light notebooks, like Ultrabooks, and beautiful designs that combine form and function come immediately to mind. We have shown how something you can't do without also can be a style statement.

Audio is an important area for change, too, because today a PC is a vehicle for music, YouTube videos, downloaded media, video chats, online trainings, a whole range of things. Differentiated technology like Beats Audio from HP really helps us give our customers an outstanding experience.

We are very happy with our portfolio and it only gets better with our Windows 8 products. Advances in touch capabilities and what that means for hybrid and tablet designs and features like "instant on" and "always connected" are really meaningful. We need to earn our customers' loyalty every day.  And we, along with our channel partners, are committed to it.

HP has begun to announce new Windows 8 PCs, like the Spectre One, which will go on sale in November. Image: HP

PCW: What are consumers' computing needs going to be towards the end of the decade?

Bradley: I think there are two really big trends that are going to dominate the market later this decade. First is because of the explosion of new device types--tablets, phones, etc.--that are just in the beginning stages. People will really want to manage their personal collection of devices and clouds. We feel really good about our potential to lead this trend.

The second big area will be security. We build very secure devices for commercial customers today, but they take an IT department to manage to the fullest extent. Making security robust and easy for the consumer will be key in the coming years.

Of course, the trend toward thin, light and beautiful plus supercharged connectivity will continue.  NFC is promising, and we're adding it to some PCs in our portfolio. More web-connected devices, like some of our printers today. Great screens using IPS technology, meaning your content is viewable at any angle. Customizable tablets so enterprise verticals can really get exactly what they need.

PCW: What do you see as the needs of small- and medium-sized business today and the solutions HP hopes to bring them today?

Bradley: It's a combination of things.

It starts with productivity and how we enable these companies and people to be efficient. That's super important for these people. Clearly security and mobility is important, but I think productivity and value for the money are as important. That's what we focus on for these guys.

PCW: And what about actual computing needs for these small businesses?

Bradley: Most small business owners don't really have the luxury of owning a home and work PC. They have one that does double duty all the time. When we think of the Folio X 13 or Spectre XT these are elegant solutions that offer security and manageability. These are the things that they need for their businesses at the same time offer great design and features like Beats Audio that help them enhance their free time.

PCW: What's your forecast on mobile printing as more people use smartphones and tablets that are tethered to a printer?

The HP Folio X 13 boasts nine hours of battery life and a 13.3-inch high-definition display.

Bradley: When it comes to printing and mobility services, we feel very well positioned. HP introduced the world's first web-enabled printer back in 2009, and we continue to roll out new web-enabled print services to make mobile printing easy. HP was the first to give printers their own ePrint email address so you can print to virtually anywhere, including public print locations; and with the HP ePrint app you essentially have a print button right on your smartphone.

PCW: You've talked a lot about printing from smartphones. How popular is printing from a smartphone and do you see it as a growing niche.

Bradley: I don't think we call it a niche. Clearly there is an opportunity there that further enhances the relevance of printing. A lot of work we do is making people more aware of what we offer.

We've seen mostly documents being printed. One cut of the data shows 70 to 30 in favor of documents with the balance being photos. It's a bit opposite of what we traditionally think of home printing. The products are not just for taking pictures but for managing documents as well.

PCW:  Lexmark just exited the inkjet business in favor of focusing on its laser jet business. What's going on within the inkjet market that would make players such as Lexmark ditch it?

Bradley: I don't think the Lexmark thing says anything about the industry. We are extraordinary excited about our roadmap and what we have to launch.

PCW: Do you have a webOS status update? Any licensing deals?

Bradley: HP is executing its plan to deliver an open webOS under a new organization called Gram.  HP will make webOS source code available under the Apache License, Version 2.0, and we expect the full source code for open webOS to be available by September.

Bradley is a seven-year veteran of HP and before joining the company he was the chief executive officer of Palm. Before that, Bradley was executive vice president of global operations for Gateway.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010132/hp-honcho-bradley-post-pc-world-claim-just-wrong.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
00.00 | 0 komentar | Read More

IE exploit distributes PlugX malware, researchers say

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 19 September 2012 | 19.59

Researchers from security vendor AlienVault have identified a variant of a recently discovered Internet Explorer exploit that is used to infect targeted computers with the PlugX remote access Trojan (RAT) program.

The newly discovered exploit variant targets the same unpatched vulnerability in IE 6, 7, 8 and 9 as the original exploit, but uses slightly different code and has a different payload, AlienVault Labs manager Jaime Blasco said Tuesday in a blog post.

The first exploit was found over the weekend on a known malicious server by security researcher Eric Romang and distributed the Poison Ivy RAT. The second exploit version discovered by AlienVault researchers was found on a different server and installs a much newer RAT program called PlugX.

However, file modification dates seen on both servers suggest that both versions of the exploit have been in use since at least September 14.

"We know that the group actively using the PlugX malware also called Flowershow had access to the Internet Explorer ZeroDay [exploit targeting an unpatched vulnerability] days before it was uncovered," Blasco said. "Due to the similarities of the new discovered exploit code and the one discovered some days ago it is very likely that the same group is behind both instances."

AlienVault researchers have been tracking attacks that use the PlugX RAT since earlier this year. Based on file debug paths found inside the malware, they believe that the relatively new RAT was developed by a Chinese hacker known as WHG, who had previous ties with the Network Crack Program Hacker (NCPH), a well known Chinese hacker group.

AlienVault researchers have also identified two additional websites that served the new IE exploit in the past, but no payload could be obtained from them, Blasco said. One was a defense news site from India and the other was probably a fake version of the 2nd International LED professional Symposium website, he said. (Also see "Malicious web apps: How to spot them, how to beat them.")

"It seems the guys behind this 0day were targeting specific industries," Blasco said.

The server where the original IE exploit was found also stored an exploit for an unpatched Java vulnerability last month. That Java exploit was used in attacks attributed by security researchers to a Chinese hacker group dubbed "Nitro."

Microsoft already released a security advisory about the new IE vulnerability and recommended temporary mitigation solutions while it works on a patch.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010148/ie-exploit-distributes-plugx-malware-researchers-say.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
19.59 | 0 komentar | Read More

Web browser showdown: Which Windows app is really the best?

Your Web browser is probably the most-used application on your PC. You check your email in it, you write in it, you collaborate with coworkers in it, you use it to watch cat videos. With so much at stake, you need a browser that works well for you.

But which one is the best? We put the three major Windows browsers—Google Chrome, Microsoft Internet Explorer, and Mozilla Firefox—through their paces and crowned an overall winner.

Browser performance

When we looked at the browser contenders previously, we concluded that all the major browsers loaded webpages at similar speeds.

But many new Web apps and services rely heavily on HTML5 and JavaScript, so the browser makers have been spending a lot of development time making sure that their programs render such apps and services quickly and efficiently.

To gauge how well browsers handle HTML5 and JavaScript code, we subjected Chrome, IE, and Firefox to the Sunspider JavaScript benchmark and to the WebVizBench benchmark for HTML5. In addition, we tested on a PC with switchable Nvidia graphics hardware to see how each browser exploited the extra processing horsepower in the graphics card.

Our test PC was an Acer Aspire Timeline Ultra M5 laptop with a 1.7GHz Intel Core i5 processor and 6GB of memory. The switchable graphics system consisted of an integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 chipset and a dedicated Nvidia GeForce GT 640M graphics card with 1GB of video memory.

In our WebVizBench HTML5 benchmark test, Chrome and IE 9 saw large increases in performance when we switched to the dedicated graphics card instead of the integrated graphics chip.

Chrome achieved an average score of 5502 when we used the integrated graphics system, and hit an average of 5825 when we used the Nvidia graphics card. IE 9 came in second with average scores of 4797 and 5642, respectively; Firefox finished third after posting average scores of 4492 and 5600. Notably, Chrome did almost as well on this test using the integrated graphics hardware as the other browsers did using the more powerful Nvidia graphics card. So if your PC has a weak graphics card, you'll probably get better performance from Chrome than from Firefox or IE.

Our tests for JavaScript performance were less conclusive, with all three browsers rendering the benchmark's JavaScript code within 15 milliseconds of one another. Internet Explorer 9 eked out a narrow victory, completing the Sunspider benchmark in 200 milliseconds. Chrome 21 finished in second place at 206 milliseconds, and Firefox 15 rounded out the three at 214 milliseconds.

Winner: Google Chrome. Browser performance will vary some depending on your PC, but Chrome was a solid all-around performer in our testing.

Ease of use

Current browsers continue the less-is-more trend that began with Google Chrome's introduction in 2008, sporting thin toolbars and minimalist designs so that the page content takes center stage.

Browser toolbars compared: Firefox, Internet Explorer, Chrome.

Internet Explorer 9: In IE 9, Microsoft chose a hyperminimalist approach with an extremely narrow toolbar and few on-screen controls. By default, IE 9 shows the address bar and tabs in the same row, which can make things a little too tight, especially if you frequently have a lot of tabs open at once (you can choose to show the tab bar in a separate row, though). On the far-right edge of the toolbar lie three buttons that take you to your browser homepage, show your favorites, or toggle various settings.

One nicety in IE 9 is its unobtrusive method of providing notifications: Instead of popping up an alert box that interrupts your browsing, it displays the message in a bar at the bottom of the browser window, where you can address it when you're good and ready. In addition, IE 9 shows you a download's progress via its taskbar icon, which fills in with green as you download a file.

Chrome 21: Google has stuck with the same basic look and feel for Chrome since releasing it in 2008. It has no title bar, and by default it shows only the back, forward, and reload buttons, as well as the combined search/address bar and a button on the far right that opens a tools menu. The start screen helps you reach your most visited sites, as well as any Web apps you've added via the Chrome Web Store. When you download a file, it appears in a gray bar that lives at the bottom of the window.

Click the orange button in the upper-left corner of any Firefox browser window to access frequently used commands.

Firefox 15: While most other browsers now feature a combined search and address bar, Mozilla keeps the two separate in Firefox 15. Whether separate fields are better than combined ones is a matter of personal preference.

One convenient feature of Firefox allows you to switch between search engines readily: If you want to use Bing instead of Google, for instance, you can do that with two clicks. Chrome permits you to switch between search providers, too, but requires a quick tweak in the Settings screen. With IE you need to install an add-on for each search provider (other than Bing) you want to add.

Like other current Windows browsers, Firefox doesn't show a menu bar by default; the various menu options live in a single menu that pops up when you click the orange 'Firefox' button in the upper-left corner of the window.

Winner: Tie. In truth, you won't find much differentiation between browser interfaces these days. All the prominent ones work the same, save for a few fairly minor differences.

Security and privacy features

To say that security and privacy concerns are a big deal for browser makers would be a gross understatement. All of the major browsers have some baseline security and privacy features, such as pop-up blockers, protection against phishing attacks, and some sort of cookie blocking and filtering.

IE 9 gives you lots of advanced security settings.

Internet Explorer 9: IE 9 is easily the most flexible browser out there with regard to privacy settings. Its advanced security settings let you block or allow all sorts of things, but those granular controls are a bit much for most users. For the rest of us, IE 9 offers a choice of various preset security and privacy levels.

IE 9 also includes a reputation-based download checker: If you download a questionable or previously unknown file, the browser will warn you about it. If the file is safe, it'll download the file, no questions asked. That last bit is useful because it reduces "warning fatigue"—you'll get a warning only when necessary.

In addition, IE 9 will let you see a privacy summary of the site you've just visited to learn whether it tried to use cookies to track you, among other things. IE 9 also features Tracking Protection, which allows you to set the browser to automatically block participating websites from setting a third-party cookie to track your movements online.

Firefox 9: Firefox's privacy and security settings cover all of the basics. It can block phishing sites and other malicious sites, and it permits you to turn on Do Not Track to block third-party cookies. Beyond that, Firefox 9 will clearly show you whether a shopping or banking site is safe, questionable, or unsafe via a badge in the address bar. And it includes a link to a Firefox-specific plug-in checker site so you can see if any of your plug-ins are in need of updating.

Chrome 21: Chrome's claim to security fame is the sandboxing feature, which quarantines each webpage you open so that it can't interfere with other pages you already have open, or with anything else on your PC. For example, if a page you visit tries to download a piece of malware to your PC without your knowledge, the sandboxing feature should prevent that site from carrying out its evil deeds.

Chrome does tie into a number of Google services, though; for instance, it uses Google services to autocomplete your search queries, predict which site you meant to visit if you mistype the address, and so on. If you don't trust Google, you'll want to look through Chrome's privacy settings carefully.

Winner: Chrome...with a catch. Chrome's sandboxing feature still makes it the browser to beat, but you should be mindful of its tie-ins with Google's other services.

If you could pick only one…

Google Chrome comes out ahead of its rivals, but the competition is closer than you might think. Although Chrome's simplicity, speed, and good security give it the edge over Internet Explorer and Firefox, both IE and Firefox still have a lot to offer in those areas. But hey, they're all free! Try them all, play with them, and get a feel for them, and soon you'll be able to select the one that works best for you.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2009768/web-browser-showdown-which-windows-app-is-really-the-best.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
19.59 | 0 komentar | Read More

Windows 8 System Builder will replace full version at retail

PC hobbyists will get a big break if new information on Windows 8's pricing structure is correct. The full non-upgrade versions of Windows appear to be gone from retail shelves in Microsoft's next generation operating system, replaced by a much cheaper System Builder version.

Microsoft first began offering System Builder versions with Windows 7, ranging in price from $129 for Home Premium to $229 for Ultimate. These retail prices were often steeply discounted at web retailers. This was a savings compared to the full versions, which ranged from $200 to as much as $320.

windows 8

Windows System Builder differs from the full version of Windows in how the licensing rights work. With the full version, Microsoft is much more lenient in license transferral, such a when installing a new motherboard. However, with the System Builder version, much like the copies provided with new computers, a Windows installation is limited to a single machine.

ZDNet's Mary Jo Foley uncovered additional details about the System Builder version of Windows 8 earlier this week. Her sources say the full versions of Windows 8 will completely disappear (at least at retail), which my colleague Jared Newman speculated about last month.

Pricing appears to be close to what is currently offered for Windows 7: the standard System Builder version will sell for around $100, and the Pro version between $20 and $40 more. Like the pricing for upgrade copies of Windows 8, Microsoft appears apt to sell low in an effort to not only get people to upgrade, but purchase legitimate copies of the operating system.

Piracy was and still is a big problem for Microsoft. With the full versions of Windows, in order to take advantage of transferability, all that was necessary in order to activate a copy on a second computer was to call into Microsoft's activation line and say you had changed a component. This new system would close that loophole.

Upon reaching out to Microsoft, I was unable to confirm any details regarding Windows 8's plans for a cheaper full version of its OS While the confirmed the existence of the System Builder option, a Microsoft spokesperson told PCWorld that the company has "nothing more to share at this time" regarding pricing.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2010121/windows-8-system-builder-will-replace-full-version-at-retail.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
19.59 | 0 komentar | Read More

How the HTC 8X stacks up to other Windows 8 phones

On Tuesday night, HTC posted a sly tease on its Facebook and Twitter pages—a photo that showed only the corner edge of a device with a banner that read 19.9. All became clear Wednesday morning when that mystery device was revealed to be the HTC 8X. Along with the HTC 8S, the newly unveiled 8X will make up the company's Windows Phone 8 lineup.

Amid recent releases from Samsung and Nokia, HTC will be vying for the hearts of Windows Phone fans with handsets that feature exclusive Beats Audio and the proprietary HTC ImageChip, a f/2.0, 28mm wide-angle lens with HD recording.

Much like Nokia's Lumia 920, the 8X comes in a variety of bright candy-like colors (red, blue, yellow, gray, and black); the 8S comes in blue, red, gray, and black, but it features a bright strip of color along the bottom of the handset. The super-slim unibody is tapered, and the screens—at 4.3 and 4 inches, respectively—are both smaller than the competition. Samsung's ATIV S has a 4.5-inch screen while Nokia's Lumia 920 tops out at 4.8 inches.

The 8X features what is quickly becoming an industry standard of 1280 by 720 resolution as well as the super LCD 2 screen we previously saw in the One X, while the 8S's WVGA touchscreen has a lower resolution of 800 by 480. This puts it squarely in the same arena as the ATIV S and Lumia 920, which both have a 1280 by 720 resolution. (The Lumia 820 also has a 800 by 480 resolution).

The standout feature of the 8X, however, is its camera: The front-facing camera boasts the highest megapixel count of any Windows Phone at 2.1 megapixels and an f/2.0 aperture. It is also capable of 1080p video capture. The front camera features an ultra-wide angle (88 degrees) that can capture up to four people in one shot. The rear camera, meanwhile, offers up to 8 megapixels, a CMOS sensor, backside-illumination (BSI) for quality shots in low-light, and the aforementioned ImageChip technology. Sadly, the 8S does not have a front-facing camera at all.

While the 8X has some solid specs, so do most of its competitors, even with the Lumia 920's overblown video claims. Both the 920 and the ATIV S offer 8-megapixel cameras, 1080p HD video recording, and a fairly high megapixel count in their front-facing camera. The Lumia 920 also features Nokia's floating-lens technology for image stabilization.

The rest of the specs in HTC's latest phones also run along the company line: The 8X cashes in on HTC's deal with Beats Audio (and features built-in amplifiers that are missing on the 8S), but otherwise the handset doesn't differ radically from the rest of the Windows Phone 8 family. Its 5.21-by-2.61-by-0.4-inch dimensions and 4.64-ounce weight are in line with what rival phone makers offer, as are its near-field communication (NFC) and LTE capabilities. The 16GB capacity, 1GB of RAM, and 1.5GHz dual-core processor in HTC's phone are similar to other Windows Phone 8 offerings, though its 1,800mAh battery is slightly smaller than the competitors.

While the HTC 8X may stack up quite comparably to the likes of the ATIV S and Lumia 920, the elephant in the room is how it might be able to compete with the iPhone 5, which arrives in stores this Friday. While the 8X has an eye-catching design, and stellar audio and camera capabilities that make it a great addition to the Windows Phone 8 landscape, it seems unlikely to win over Apple fans. Still, if its camera can produce images to rival the Lumia 920, the 8X could pull in a slew of folks ready to try out Windows Phone 8 software.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.techhive.com/article/2010099/how-the-htc-8x-stacks-up-to-other-windows-8-phones.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
16.01 | 0 komentar | Read More

HTC's Windows Phone 8X and Phone 8S: Hands-on

With today's launch of the HTC Windows Phone 8X and Windows Phone 8S, Microsoft has a worthy pair of flagship devices for the Windows Phone 8 platform. In an era where phone designs feel increasingly commoditized, the new HTC phones showed a design flair that's often been absent from devices that don't start their name with "i."

When I handled the devices at HTC's launch event today in New York City, I was immediately struck by how comfortable the phone felt in-hand. Each had elegantly curved sides that fit my (admittedly smallish) hands well. The rounded edges are thinner than on a phone like the Samsung Galaxy S3, but not so much so that it's distracting.

The phones were each lightweight and well-balanced. The 8X weighs 130 grams, while the 8S is slightly lighter, at 113 grams.

Each phone is elegant; they look very similar in design, but for the 8S's smaller display (4-inches to the 8X's 4.3-inches), and for its distinctive colorful accent running along the bottom, near where the dedicated Windows Phone 8 navigation keys sit (the 8S is two-piece design, whereas the 8X is a polycarbonate unibody design).

The back is a matte soft-touch finish that extends up and folds around the edges. Meanwhile, the Gorilla Glass 2 display curves a bit towards the edges, taking a design cue from the HTC One X.

HTC didn't demo a lot of screens on-site; the Windows Phone 8 operating system is still largely under wraps, save for what morsels Microsoft already revealed during the summer at a developer's event. However, noticeable immediately was that both phones feature a bonded display; which means images looked crisp, even at wide angle of view. The 8X has a 1280 by 720 pixel resolution display, and what little was on show looked great. The 8S has an 800 by 480 pixel display, but I didn't see any video on that unit.

The two phones next to a Samsung Galaxy S III

A couple of more notes about the design. The volume rocker buttons felt a bit flat and narrow to the touch, likely a side-effect of the phones' narrow depth—each measures about 10mm deep. I could see that becoming an issue over time, especially if in day-to-day use it ends up being difficult to find those buttons. But only time will tell whether that will be the case .

Several of the bright, cheery colors were on display here; I liked the navy blue and red colors the best, but there's also a fluorescent-like yellow and standard black, too.

Both phones will be released in November on over 150 carriers in more than 50 countries. Further information on carrier availability, pricing, and a handful of other specifications are still to come.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://www.techhive.com/article/2010106/htcs-windows-phone-8x-and-phone-8s-hands-on.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
16.01 | 0 komentar | Read More
Techie Blogger